You CAN update fragments within a table. You didn't show any markup, so I don't know what specific piece you want to update - there are some restrictions on what you can do in a table. But, if it's just in a TD or something, you're typically just fine.
-- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Dr. Wolf Blecher < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > maybe I just get the usual response that I have to redraw the complete > table, > but it's worth a try. > > I want to implement a Drop-Down-Detail-Table, basically it is the same > functionality as a tree-table but I don't want to show additional table > rows, > but extend the current table row with additional information. > > What I tried is to add a Fragment to my table row, where the information I > additionally want to display is encapsulated by a WebMarkupContainer whose > isVisible method depends on the "compressed" state of the detail > information. > > On the Fragment I have a AjaxLink and three labels (one to display the link > symbol, and two to display base information) > > I've overwritten the onClick Method of the Link and added the Fragment to > the > target. > > What happens when I click on the link is that the fragment gets redrawn (as > expected) but not _inside_ the repeater but merely ontop of the repeater: > > > Before Click: > ------------- > Header BlaBla > Table Head > Compressed Entry 1 > Compressed Entry 2 > Footer BlaBla > > > After Click: > ------------- > Header BlaBla > Expaneded Entry 1 > Table Head > Compressed Entry 1 > Compressed Entry 2 > Footer BlaBla > > > Does anyone has any ideas wether it is possible to update the fragment > _inside_ the table or do I have to redraw the complete table to achieve the > expected behaviour? > > Regards > > Wolf > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
