> asynchronously where they need the Application in place
As I've written I still don't see a reason why they need the Application
at all.
Sven
On 05/28/2010 05:50 PM, James Carman wrote:
So, don't use the feature. If yours works, then fine. Some folks are
doing things asynchronously where they need the Application in place.
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Sven Meier<s...@meiers.net> wrote:
But in my example start() *is* invoked on the request thread, thus the Wicket
application is available.
Please take another look on http://pastebin.com/NN58fiZx .
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-Application-runAs-Method-tp2230030p2234769.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
