Hi Igor,

Thank you for the quick response and what a ray of hope it brings! It
certainly, from  your experience seems to be a very good design approach. I
am excited to implement it.

The question(s)/confirmation at this point in time is :

1.Will Application 2..(n)  ever extend the sub-class Web Application
provided by the Container Application? [I guess not, since Application-2
needs to be built as a jar and packaged with Container-Application's WAR.
Which means sub application's (jars) will all be part of a Single Wicket
Application instance] (Am I right?)

2. The Tab Provider Interface you mentioned that would be part of the common
jar in Container-Application; would that be a class like
org.apache.wicket.extensions.markup.html.tabs.AbstractTab ? This is what I
have used at the moment.

Appreciate your time. Glad to be using the right framework and not have to
switch to another framework.

Many thanks
Regards





On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[email protected]>wrote:

> ive done this many times already, wicket is perfect for things like these.
>
> application 1 should be a simple wicket container app. this is a full
> application with its own subclass of WicketApplication and is what is
> going to be packaged as a war file. it should also have a module (jar)
> with the interfaces for the common services it provides and a way to
> retrieve those interfaces.
>
> application 2 should be a jar file which contains all the necessary
> wicket artifacts such as pages. one of the things in it should be
> something that implements a "tabprovider" interface defined in
> application 1's common jar. the tabprovider would return a tab that
> contains a panel from application 2, this panel would act as the entry
> point into the application.
>
> the only other question is now packaging and deployment. the easiest
> way is to take the jar from application 2 and package it into
> application 1 as part of the war file. a trickier way to do it is to
> have a classloader that can look in some external folder and load from
> all the jars there, this external folder would contain the jars for
> application 2...n.
>
> -igor
>
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Nivedan Nadaraj <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I will try to articulate my requirement. Can I call it a Wicket based
> > Portal?
> >
> > I have an application lets call it Application-1  that provides common
> > functionality such as Authentication/Authorization. It also will provide
> the
> > Business layer/Service methods.
> > As part of this web application, it builds the the TOP level tab menus.
> Each
> > of the tab menu will represent a related business application. There is
> one
> > single entry point to the whole application suite.
> >
> > Now, I want to build one of the related business
> application(Application-2)
> > using Wicket, Hibernate etc and inherit the common functionality provided
> by
> > Application-1. However, I want to provide/or add to the Tab menu provided
> by
> > Application-1 and integrate with it. As part of Application-1, I want to
> be
> > able to provide Tab1. And as part of Appication-2, I want to be able to
> > provide Tab2.
> >
> > So when I eventually build the whole application suite, I must be able to
> > enable/disable a particular application tab or access to an application
> > through some business rules (License) etc. Also it should give me the
> > flexibility to
> > maintain each module/application independently and allow me to deploy a
> > particular module for a client.
> >
> > It is pretty critical that  I have a good solution that gives a
> reasonable
> > amount of flexibility. I am sure you must have come across such
> > requirements, more like a portal. Only, I have to build it using Wicket.
> > Just so you are aware this is the set up for the project.
> >
> > Web Tier: Wicket with Wiquery
> > Security: Apache Shiro
> > Service Tier: Spring
> > Model/Persistence: Hibernate/Spring LDAP
> > Servlet Engine: Tomcat
> >
> > Would be great to hear some pattern I can follow and references if any
> that
> > can serve as a start-up. Any thoughts/experience from your end would be
> > great and valuable.
> >
> > Some doubts that lurks in my mind.
> >
> > 1. Does Application-2 need to have a Wicket Application .i.e need to
> extend
> > a Wicket Application? Makes sense if I want to deploy it as a stand-alone
> > one.But If i want to integrate and use the set up as part of
> Application-1,
> > should I build the project without a Wicket Applications?
> >
> > 2. How does Application- 2 render the Tabs and integrate with
> Application-1
> > that does not know/aware of its child projects?
> >
> > 3. As an alternative, I can build application-2 as part of application-1.
> > The downside is, when a client wants only few modules, I would need to
> build
> > and package the whole suite.This is my last resort but sure your thoughts
> > will make a difference.
> >
> > Appreciate your thoughts and time,
> >
> > Many thanks
> > Nivedan
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to