Personally I think the hive file is sufficient. Also annotations take more time to compile :)
2010/6/11 Papegaaij [via Apache Wicket] < [email protected]<ml-node%[email protected]> > > On Wednesday 09 June 2010 21:30:39 ViShap wrote: > > I just stumbled upon this announce and didn't have the time to dig deep > > into the code, and the links you suggested don't mention anything, so i > > have a short question: > > > > Is it possible to use annotations instead of that manual hive-file? > > > > If not: Is it planned or if not, why is it discarded? > > With wicket-security 1.4, this is not possible. We (at Topicus) developed a > > set of annotations to replace the hive file, but at this moment it is not > clear if (or what part) of that set of annotations can be moved to wicket- > security and when I will have the time to do it. This will not be part of > 1.4, > but perhaps 1.5. > > Best regards, > Emond > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden > email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2251368&i=0> > For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden > email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2251368&i=1> > > > > ------------------------------ > View message @ > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/announce-Wicket-Security-1-4-released-tp2237419p2251368.html > To start a new topic under Wicket - User, email > [email protected]<ml-node%[email protected]> > To unsubscribe from Wicket - User, click > here<http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/subscriptions/Unsubscribe.jtp?code=bWV1bGVtYW5zLmRhdmlkQGdtYWlsLmNvbXwxODQyOTQ3fC0xOTcyOTcxMjQ2>. > > > -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/announce-Wicket-Security-1-4-released-tp2237419p2251509.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
