im not sure if this is in a CDI spec or not, but afaik Weld will return serializable proxies when you manually inject objects. so that should work out of the box.
-igor On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Harald Wellmann <harald.wellm...@multi-m.de> wrote: > Yes, @EJB is still available, and it is still required in some cases. But the > general approach to injection has changed with CDI. See > http://seamframework.org/Community/InjectingWithEJBOrInject for a discussion. > > My original question is about how to use Wicket with CDI (injecting EJBs and > other beans), and your suggestion is not to use CDI, which does not really > solve the problem... > > By the way, the nice thing about @Inject is that you no longer have to use > JNDI lookups or bean names in @EJB annotations. > > And the specific problem is NOT that @Inject does not not work for EJBs, but > the injected proxies fail to serialize properly. > > If I understand the javaee-inject implementation correctly, it takes care not > to serialize proxies but replaces them by references on serialization, > looking up the same reference again on deserialization. > > I suppose my problem would be solved if the CDI InjectionTarget were using > this approach, but this is a CDI implementation detail and out of my control. > > Anybody else out there using Wicket+CDI+EJB? Have you come across similar > problems? > > Best regards, > > Harald > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Major Péter [mailto:majorpe...@sch.bme.hu] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. Juli 2010 19:43 > An: users@wicket.apache.org > Betreff: Re: AW: Serialization of injected EJBs > > Nope, it does not support CDI. AFAIK @EJB is not deprecated or > old-style, and it's still available in Java EE 6. The thread was about > injecting EJB's and JavaEE Inject does exactly that. > You can always use lookups for your beans/CDI stuff... > > Regards, > Peter > > 2010-07-07 19:34 keltezéssel, Harald Wellmann írta: >> Does javaee-inject support CDI at all? I cannot find any @Inject annotations >> in the examples you mentioned, they all seem to be in Java EE 5 style, not >> Java EE 6. >> >> Regards, >> >> Harald > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
