-1 to removing it As soon as uPortal supports JSR-286 (and it does, just not in a release yet) I'll be using Wicket for my portlet development and have been training my team in readiness.
At a minimum move it to wicketstuff. thanks, Steve On 12/08/2010, at 5:19 AM, Rodolfo Hansen wrote: > I used wikcet 1.4 inside Liferay 5.2 and sent a tiny patch that was > implemented in 1.4.7 > > I no longer use wicket inside a portlet container, but I can help > support it. > > > On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 14:45 -0400, James Carman wrote: > >> I'd say at least move it to wicketstuff, so that if there's some other >> person out there with the will and means to take the project on, they >> can do so. >> >> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I just created a ticket (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2976) >>> to remove the support for Portlets in Wicket 1.5. >>> It is currently broken because of the re-work of WicketFilter and request >>> processing. >>> Since none of the active core developers use this technology in his daily >>> job it is hard for us to support it. >>> Now is the time to vote against this decision and give us a hand to improve >>> it or just silently agree. >>> >>> martin-g >>> >>> P.S. I sent this email earlier today but for some reason it was rejected. >>> Excuse me if you receive it for second time. >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
