Hi!

It might (and does) depend on other form component values.

**
Martin

2010/8/15 Jeremy Thomerson <jer...@wickettraining.com>:
> Why should the validation value be able to change?  Why should it be a
> moving target?
>
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Martin Makundi <
> martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
>
>> Maybe MaximumValidator should take IModel? Why validators don't comply
>> to the general pattern of using IModel...?
>>
>> **
>> Martin
>>
>> 2010/8/15 Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com>:
>> > the decorator just does the caching you want, tweaking the validators
>> > is left up to you.
>> >
>> > -igor
>> >
>> > On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Martin Makundi
>> > <martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
>> >> Ok. That's pretty much same as my inline override. Is there a way to
>> >> adjust  mini/max value on the fly?
>> >>
>> >> **
>> >> Martin
>> >>
>> >> 2010/8/14 Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com>:
>> >>> it would mean add(new CachingDecorator(new MinimumValidator()));
>> >>>
>> >>> -igor
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Martin Makundi
>> >>> <martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
>> >>>> Thankx igor, what do you mean validator decorator? I am working on
>> >>>> overriding MaximumValidator which practically means re-implementing it
>> >>>> because the maximum value annot be changed on the fly. Decorator
>> >>>> sounds nice...what would it mean in the case of
>> >>>> Minimum/MaximumValidator or equivalent?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> **
>> >>>> Martin
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 2010/8/14 Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com>:
>> >>>>> You can create a validator decorator that does caching however you
>> want
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> -igor
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Aug 14, 2010 9:16 AM, "Martin Makundi" <
>> >>>>> martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Hi!
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Is it a necessary feature that validation occurs on components whose
>> >>>>> values have not changed?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> We have quite heavy validation criteria so it would be nice to
>> >>>>> optimize initializing the validator only for cases where component
>> >>>>> value has actually changed.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> We can do this with !getModelComparator().compare(this,
>> >>>>> convertedInput) but maybe this should be default behavior?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Good reasons why not? Unchanged values are not anyways updated to
>> >>>>> model so why should they be validated.. just in case if validation
>> >>>>> criteria has changed since previous submit?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> **
>> >>>>> Martin
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://www.wickettraining.com
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Reply via email to