Thanks for expressing your help on this, im already working on it :-), since is not that hard to implement, but i would like to see this kind of functionality in the core . :)
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 10:09 AM, James Carman [via Apache Wicket] < ml-node+2338212-617428318-65...@n4.nabble.com<ml-node%2b2338212-617428318-65...@n4.nabble.com> > wrote: > Do you want an example of how it would work or are you confident in > how to implement it yourself? > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:05 AM, jcgarciam <[hidden > email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2338212&i=0>> > wrote: > > > > > Hi James, I like the idea of having a way of automatically includes > > components in the AjaxRequestTarget without the need to do it explicitly > > (target.add(..)), by using a Marking Interface and the Visitor, it really > > > would make things easier when you want to add a new component to the > current > > Ajax Response. > > > > The idea of the DynamicProxy seems very promising and i thinks it > something > > way much better of having Pub/Sub event implementation. > > > > Just my +0.05 cents :) > > > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:11 AM, James Carman [via Apache Wicket] < > > [hidden email] > > <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2338212&i=1><[hidden > email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2338212&i=2>> > >> wrote: > > > >> What about if we modify this idea a bit? What if we use dynamic > >> proxies to make it more generic? So, your onclick method would look > >> like: > >> > >> public void onClick(AjaxRequestTarget target) { > >> fire(MyCustomEventListener.class).someAjaxEvent(target); > >> } > >> > >> Then, the fire() method would return an object (a dynamic proxy) that > >> implements the MyCustomEventListener interface. The method > >> implementation would do the visitor thing by looking for all > >> components implementing the MyCustomEventListener interface and then > >> call the someAjaxEvent() method. > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 5:10 AM, vladimir.kovalyuk <[hidden email]< > http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2338119&i=0>> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > I don't like subscriptions implementation. Somewhen it becomes > difficult > >> to > >> > realize when to add/remove observers. It depends on the order of > >> > instantiations. Visitor pattern seems to be much more reliable. > >> > -- > >> > View this message in context: > >> > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Best-practice-for-component-interaction-tp2336888p2337874.html<http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Best-practice-for-component-interaction-tp2336888p2337874.html?by-user=t> > < > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Best-practice-for-component-interaction-tp2336888p2337874.html?by-user=t<http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Best-practice-for-component-interaction-tp2336888p2337874.html?by-user=t&by-user=t>> > > >> > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]< > http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2338119&i=1> > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]< > http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2338119&i=2> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]< > http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2338119&i=3> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]< > http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2338119&i=4> > >> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------ > >> View message @ > >> > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Best-practice-for-component-interaction-tp2336888p2338119.html<http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Best-practice-for-component-interaction-tp2336888p2338119.html?by-user=t> > >> To unsubscribe from Apache Wicket, click here< > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/template/TplServlet.jtp?tpl=unsubscribe_by_code&node=1842946&code=amNnYXJjaWFtQGdtYWlsLmNvbXwxODQyOTQ2fDEyNTYxMzc3ODY=<http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/template/TplServlet.jtp?tpl=unsubscribe_by_code&node=1842946&code=amNnYXJjaWFtQGdtYWlsLmNvbXwxODQyOTQ2fDEyNTYxMzc3ODY=&by-user=t>>. > > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Sincerely, > > JC (http://www.linkedin.com/in/jcgarciam) > > Work smarter, not harder!. > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Best-practice-for-component-interaction-tp2336888p2338205.html<http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Best-practice-for-component-interaction-tp2336888p2338205.html?by-user=t> > > > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden > email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2338212&i=3> > For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden > email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=2338212&i=4> > > > > ------------------------------ > View message @ > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Best-practice-for-component-interaction-tp2336888p2338212.html > To unsubscribe from Apache Wicket, click > here<http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/template/TplServlet.jtp?tpl=unsubscribe_by_code&node=1842946&code=amNnYXJjaWFtQGdtYWlsLmNvbXwxODQyOTQ2fDEyNTYxMzc3ODY=>. > > > -- Sincerely, JC (http://www.linkedin.com/in/jcgarciam) Work smarter, not harder!. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Best-practice-for-component-interaction-tp2336888p2338215.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
