A couple that come to mind, but aren't on that list are: www.springer.com - publisher mobile.walmart.com - retailer
Scott On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Jeremy Thomerson <jer...@wickettraining.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Chris Colman > <chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com>wrote: > >> The 'popularity' test is very vague but I understand it's purpose, they >> want to ensure that they use products that are widely used and have an >> active user community: which is very true of Wicket. Does anyone have >> some numbers on this? Like how many Wicket developers there are, or how >> many websites are Wicket driven? Is there a page on the wicket website >> that contains a list of the companies/products that use Wicket - if not, >> should we add one? >> > > There's no way to quantify this metric. And don't let them use the false > "job search" *technique* to think that they know. There are too many > reasons that you don't get accurate numbers from this. There is a page on > the wiki that lists a fraction of the sites using Wicket. > https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/websites-based-on-wicket.html > > Ultimately, I would direct them away from this. It doesn't *actually* > matter. What matters is this (in roughly this order): > > 1. Pick a technology that fits your needs > 2. Pick a technology that is productive > 3. Pick a technology that, when you hit a stumbling block, you can get > help with. > > You've already demonstrated one and two. Number three can be demonstrated > by asking them to subscribe to the dev and users lists here for a week. > Then dare them to find an open source web framework that has better > community support. I haven't seen one. > > -- > Jeremy Thomerson > http://www.wickettraining.com > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
