> Let's say both libraries are "modern" (because private scope is old-fashion,
> right) and export "message" with Page scope.
> Then project X (Lombok, Bindgen) finds the problem at compile time and
> explain you that both lib A and B export component with the same id.
> What would you do now ?
> Throw away either lib A or B and re-write it ?

Please give a concrete example of such situation. If names are panel
or page scope I cannot immagine many worthwile items that can be
imported onto panels and pages that cannot be refactored.

**
Martin

>
>>
>> **
>> Martin
>>
>> >
>> >>
>> >> **
>> >> Martin
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >> I think if you find component hierarchies to be "hell", you probably
>> >> >> aren't
>> >> >> using Wicket right. Break things down into small reusable chunks
>> using
>> >> >> Panels and you will find everything gets much, much easier.
>> >> >
>> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Reply via email to