>> Very good point: cleaner code! Finally complex wicket pages will look >> like their hello-world counterparts. > > You're becoming a bit irrational here, Martin. Let's try to stay on > point. He brings up a valid point and we should respect his opinion, > much like we're respecting yours. Remember, you are in the minority > in this conversation thus far. Let's keep the gloves up.
James, I totally agree with Sebastian. I really think that now with this change also complex wicket pages can look like hamburgers on menu ;) >> So you mean that if a manufacturer manufactures a gun they are not >> conciously making the decision that somebody is getting shot? >> > > This has nothing to do with what we're talking about. Nor does it in > any way parallel what I'm saying. I just think that is a bit far-fetched that we should not manufacture features into wicket that can be used to make a mess. It's responsibility of the eventual developing team to keep it clean or use more strict add() method to keep it safe. ** Martin > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
