On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:21:47 -0600 Jeremy Thomerson <jer...@wickettraining.com> wrote: > Not really. You could have dynamic resources referenced in your > constructor that depend on instance variables, or the model that was > passed into the constructor, etc.... For anything that doesn't need > that, you are right: it's better to use a shared resource. But, if > you must rely on state from the page, you can't really use a shared > resource.
Well, yeah. My second message was poorly worded in that regard, but that's basically what I said initially. Use sticky sessions ;-) Carl-Eric www.wicketbuch.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
