create a quickstart and attach it to jira
thanks
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 6:46 PM, hok <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the fast response.
> I've tried to test it with a simple test page, containing one AjaxLink:
>
> public class TestPage extends WebPage {
>
> public TestPage() {
> }
>
> @Override
> protected void onInitialize() {
> super.onInitialize();
> add(new AjaxLink<Void>("link") {
>
> private static final long serialVersionUID =
> 1135836169949178116L;
>
> @Override
> public void onClick(AjaxRequestTarget target) {
> target.appendJavascript("alert('test')");
> }
> });
> }
> }
>
> In this scenario the ajax link is working fine, but in chrome 9 the id's
> are
> always incremented with 2, while in firefox 3.6 it's a bit strange - on the
> first reload the id is incremented with 3, on the second time with 4 and
> after this on every reload the id is incremented by 1 (this is a repeated
> pattern that happens every time).
>
> I've also tried with the same page, but this time containing only a Form
> (stateful):
>
> public class TestPage extends WebPage {
>
> public TestPage() {
> }
>
> @Override
> protected void onInitialize() {
> super.onInitialize();
> add(new Form<Void>("form"));
> }
> }
>
> The result with both pages is the same, the second page doesn't have any
> links. Can those page-not-found requests that lead to the incrementing ids
> lead to a slower page load time and increased load on the server? Thanks.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Custom-error-404-page-and-page-id-s-tp3220118p3220233.html
> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
