Hi Per, easy to read, good advice... Even the easiest stuff made me wonder whether I did that right... Excellent to see all these tips together.
Thanks a bunch! Antoine On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Per <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Antoine, > > I have started collecting my hints over here: > > http://www.small-improvements.com/blog/technical/tuning-wicket-session-size > > Please note that much of it may be considered hacks and bad practice (I > am just a Wicket user, not a Wicket master). There may be better ways to > achieve the same results. I'd love to get feedback on these suggestions! > So give it a shot and tell me how you went! > > Good luck! > Per > > >> *bump* >> >> I'm one of those people who is reading :-) >> >> >> Antoine >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Per <[hidden email] >> </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3330006&i=0>> wrote: >> >> > >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > I am measuring it in a profiler after the request has been completed, >> > but thanks for the hint. >> > >> > In case anyone else is reading, I have been playing with the >> > onComponentTag() and onComponentTagBody() methods on the weekend, and >> > I've been able to reduce my page sizes significantly. Admittedly, this >> > comes at the expense of flexibility and beauty, but I'm only doing this >> > in the inner loops of very few pages, so who cares :-) Will write a >> > summary with a couple of hints once I stop drowning in work. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Per >> > >> > >> >> > Reading in the other thread that a session size of 100K or less >> >> > is achievable, I'll admit defeat now: I have not been able to shrink >> >> some of >> >> > my pages(!) to less than 200K, not to mention the sessions. Despite >> >> LDMs, >> >> > CompoundPropertyModels, and no, there are no domain objects in >> >> there, and no >> >> > finals. >> >> >> >> How are you measuring this? Keep in mind that if you calculate when a >> >> request is still processing, you might still be measuring temporary >> >> data (e.g. for LoadableDetachableModel, you would also measure the >> >> transientModelObject, and same for any proxies (Spring/ Guice) you >> >> might use. >> >> >> >> Eelco >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] >> >> </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3316743&i=0> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] >> >> </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3316743&i=1> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the >> >> discussion below: >> >> >> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3316743.html >> <http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3316743.html?by-user=t> >> >> >> >> To unsubscribe from Just 100K per session? That would be my dream come >> >> true! (Anyone here who has tuned session size before?), click here >> >> >> <http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=3308014&code=cGVyQGhhbWJ1cmcuZGV8MzMwODAxNHwtMjI2MTAwMzE0 >> <http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=3308014&code=cGVyQGhhbWJ1cmcuZGV8MzMwODAxNHwtMjI2MTAwMzE0&by-user=t>>. >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > View this message in context: >> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3317403.html >> <http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3317403.html?by-user=t> >> > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] >> </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3330006&i=1> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] >> </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3330006&i=2> >> > >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] >> </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3330006&i=3> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] >> </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3330006&i=4> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the >> discussion below: >> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3330006.html >> >> To unsubscribe from Just 100K per session? That would be my dream come >> true! (Anyone here who has tuned session size before?), click here >> <http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=3308014&code=cGVyQGhhbWJ1cmcuZGV8MzMwODAxNHwtMjI2MTAwMzE0>. >> > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Just-100K-per-session-That-would-be-my-dream-come-true-Anyone-here-who-has-tuned-session-size-before-tp3308014p3330425.html > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
