Ok I've given it a run.. And are having problems :( It still does'nt seem like ViewOrEdit honors the fact that it is either ViewOrEdit. So it either looks like: http://img826.imageshack.us/i/greenshot20110310111030.png/ Or http://img689.imageshack.us/i/greenshot20110310111207.png/
If I try to run the examples I get and error: http://img833.imageshack.us/i/greenshot20110310111126.png/ Also I had to add the servlet api inorder to run the ant build, as well as putting the jar files besides the other wicket dependencies. Index: branches/1.5/visural-wicket-examples/lib/nblibraries.properties =================================================================== --- branches/1.5/visural-wicket-examples/lib/nblibraries.properties (revision 266) +++ branches/1.5/visural-wicket-examples/lib/nblibraries.properties (working copy) @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ libs.visural-wicket.src=\ ${base}/visural-wicket/visural-wicket-0.5-sources.jar libs.Wicket.classpath=\ + ${base}/Wicket/servlet-api-2.5-20081211.jar;\ ${base}/Wicket/slf4j-api-1.4.2.jar;\ ${base}/Wicket/slf4j-jdk14-1.4.2.jar;\ ${base}/Wicket/wicket-core-1.5-rc2.jar;\ 2011/3/9 nino martinez wael <[email protected]> > Thanks. I'll give feedback if needed > On Mar 9, 2011 4:22 AM, "Richard Nichols" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've committed what appears to be a mostly working visural-wicket with > 1.5 > > (rc2) compatibility. > > > > > http://code.google.com/p/visural-wicket/source/browse/#svn%2Fbranches%2F1.5 > > > > If there are any issues found, please report them at > > http://code.google.com/p/visural-wicket/ > > > > cheers, > > Richard. > > > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:30 AM, nino martinez wael < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> ok great.. I'll probably take at look at it monday then.. > >> > >> 2011/3/8 Richard Nichols <[email protected]> > >> > >> > Hi Nino, > >> > > >> > The version in the public respository 1.5 branch is still a direct > copy > >> of > >> > 1.4 - sorry I haven't commited the WIP 1.5 changes yet. > >> > > >> > I'll aim to get the WIP committed in this week. > >> > > >> > cheers, > >> > Richard. > >> > > >> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:47 PM, nino martinez wael < > >> > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > > Strange it compiles well, but does not work as wanted.. Any idea on > >> which > >> > > parts are causing the problems? On my dropdowns the dropdowns are > >> empty, > >> > > and in my textfields both the text and the span are added if in view > >> > mode, > >> > > and if not 2 textfields are added. > >> > > > >> > > 2011/3/5 Richard Nichols <[email protected]> > >> > > > >> > > > I've created a 1.5 branch and it's in the works. 1.5 broke more > stuff > >> > > > than expected :) > >> > > > > >> > > > Hopefully I can have a beta 1.5 branch functional within a few > weeks > >> > > > > >> > > > Sent from my iPhone > >> > > > > >> > > > On 05/03/2011, at 6:15 AM, nino martinez wael > >> > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > So does has anybody run it on wicket 1.5, or is there something > in > >> > the > >> > > > works > >> > > > > for it? > >> > > > > > >> > > > > regards Nino > >> > > > > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Richard Nichols > >> > http://www.richardnichols.net/ :: http://onmydoorstep.com.au/ > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Richard Nichols > > http://www.richardnichols.net/ :: http://onmydoorstep.com.au/ >
