oh the irony! -igor
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]> wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1382 > Funny, it was you who asked for this feature :-) > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 6:00 PM, nino martinez wael < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> because it changes references. So it does need to be repainted. Problem are >> with the anticache parameter we are forcing the browser to download the >> image again instead of pulling it from browser cache. That makes it >> flicker... >> >> 2011/3/15 Martin Grigorov <[email protected]> >> >>> Why do you put the image in the AjaxRequestTarget if you don't want to >>> repaint it ? >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 7:33 PM, nino martinez wael < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi >>> > >>> > I had a problem where Image always added the anticache on ajax calls, in >>> my >>> > case we actually wanted the pictures to be read from cache (that way we >>> can >>> > avoid flickering). However it is not possible with Image to specify that >>> > you >>> > do not want the anti cache appended.. Could we either have an option to >>> > tell >>> > image that we don't want anti cache or at least have a mechanism so we >>> can >>> > override the appropriate parts.. Should I do an RFE? >>> > >>> > >>> > regards Nino >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Martin Grigorov >>> jWeekend >>> Training, Consulting, Development >>> http://jWeekend.com <http://jweekend.com/> >>> >> >> > > > -- > Martin Grigorov > jWeekend > Training, Consulting, Development > http://jWeekend.com <http://jweekend.com/> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
