Gotta be a aprils fools thing.. Who would decide what framework to be used based on version number? Why not take a look at architecture instead... Ooh lets chose windows 95 instead of windows 7, it has a higher number so it gotta be better .
2011/4/1 Igor Vaynberg <[email protected]>: > where do i apply for a job there? sounds like fun! > > -igor > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jim Pinkham <[email protected]> wrote: >> I've had a hard time lately trying to get corporate acceptance of the Wicket >> framework. >> >> In fact, our company looked at this comparison of java frameworks: >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_application_frameworks >> >> *Project* *Current Stable Version* Apache Click 2.2.0 Apache Cocoon >> 2.2.0 Apache Struts 2.2.1.1 Apache Tapestry 5.2.4 Apache Wicket >> 1.4.15 AppFuse 2.0.2 Aranea 1.0.10 Eclipse RAP 1.2.0 FormEngine >> 1.7.1 Google Web Toolkit 2.2.0 Hamlets 1.6 IceFaces 2 ItsNat >> 1 JavaServer >> Faces 2 JBoss Seam 2.2.0 GA Jspx-bay 1.1.0 JVx WebUI 0.8 >> ManyDesigns >> Portofino 3.1.10 OpenLaszlo 4.1 OpenXava 4.0.1 Oracle ADF 11.1.1.4 >> Play 1.1.1 RIFE 1.6.2 Shale 1.0.4 Sling 5 SmartClient 8 Spring >> 3.0.5 Stripes 1.5.4 Telosys 1.1.1 ThinWire 1.2 Vaadin(IT Mill >> Toolkit) 6.5.1 Wavemaker 6.1.10 WebObjects 5.4.3 WebWork 2.2.6 >> ZK 5.0.5 ztemplates 0.9.9.6 >> >> The powers that be decided to pick Smart Client over Apache Wicket because >> they have the highest version number. >> >> So, I think the time is right to move straight to the front of the pack and >> release version 10.0. >> >> Who's with me? >> >> -- Jim >> >> Spinal Tap Industries, Inc. >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
