yes the idea is not to have the huber jar, it's all about this, is the main feature :) some guys in the felix maling list suggested me that's actually possible and supported, it's called WAB, that's a war without /lib (a partially reverse recursive achronim for A Better War)
http://old.nabble.com/A-better-life%3A-quick-webapp-deploy-to31334158.html I'll go for that tomorrow. On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>wrote: > I'm not an OSGi user but here is what I'll do. > > 1) create a new Maven project with packaging type 'pom' > 2) combine all wicket jars in one (uber-jar) > there are several approaches here: > 1) maven-shade-plugin > 2) the way we did it in RC1 with maven-dependency-plugin: see > > http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/wicket/wicket/1.5-RC1/wicket-1.5-RC1.pom > > Here check that works with simple Wicket app (e.g. the quickstart). > > Creating one big jar with all dependendies is against OSGi idea. The goal > is > to be able to replace dependencies without restarting, e.g. upgrade the > service layer without undeploying the presentation. > But if you still want to do it: start adding more dependencies to be > packed > in the uber jar (spring, hibernate) > > About WicketFilter: > - you can use embedded Jetty or Guice Filter > and org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.FILTER_MAPPING_PARAM (I > explained this earlier today in another thread) > - OSGi 4.1+ has the notion of enterprise OSGi and you can use plain OSGi > gymnastics to do that (I have no experience at all in this) > -- > Martin Grigorov > jWeekend > Training, Consulting, Development > http://jWeekend.com <http://jweekend.com/> >
