I use both for development, check once in a while if the app stil works in
ie. ..
On May 23, 2011 7:54 PM, "Eelco Hillenius" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Imho the overall user experience in Chrome is better, including the
> developer tools. Even if it might miss a feature of two :-)
>
> Eelco
>
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>
wrote:
>> Well, I don't share your opinion here :-)
>>
>> Chrome Dev tools have no "persist console content" - once you reload the
>> page all the logs are gone. There is a RFE for that and I voted for it.
>> Also I miss the 'Net' tab.
>> Also Firefox's WebDeveloper tools are much better than current state in
>> Chrome and its extensions.
>>
>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Brown, Berlin [GCG-PFS] <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> FYI...
>>>
>>> I usually ask questions but I thought I post a comment about google
>>> chrome. The chrome browser has default web debugging that is similar to
>>> firebug.
>>>
>>> With Firebug, it is more difficult to detect the wicket ajax rendered
>>> content but comes up automatically in chrome. Also speed wise, chrome
>>> renders much faster than IE or Firefox. I tested Ajax oriented complex
>>> content and chrome just works quickly.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Martin Grigorov
>> jWeekend
>> Training, Consulting, Development
>> http://jWeekend.com <http://jweekend.com/>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
