IIUC, other frameworks allow for the injection of a classloader. Wouldn't that 
be enough?

We could then package an optional classloader just for that purpose.


Cheers,
=David



On Jun 24, 2011, at 4:34 PM, Brian Topping wrote:

> It seems that Wicket should not be burdened with this tracking that is only 
> used in OSGi configurations.  Another issue is that an admin will use OSGi 
> interfaces to swap out bundles, not wicket interfaces.  OSGi is going to use 
> the BundleActivator of the component bundle to stop it, and it won't know to 
> tell the wicket core service anything about what it's doing to the component 
> bundle.  Thus it needs to know whether and/or when it can unload.  
> 
> Once a bundle is in the STOPPING state, it's no longer an active service, so 
> it cannot call other services or be called by them.  Yet, the tracking needs 
> to be updated so the blocked call to stop can unblock, hence the weak 
> reference collection.  
> 
> On Jun 23, 2011, at 8:05 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> 
>> i think the frameworks should track this. this way wicket can track
>> what it is serializing and when it is letting it go. jetty can keep
>> track of what it has in its http session.
>> 
>> the serialization bundle should provide a way for bundles to tell it
>> "i am holding on to class A from bundle B" and i no longer care about
>> class C from bundle D"
>> 
>> -igor
>> 
>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Brian Topping <topp...@codehaus.org> wrote:
>>> Good point.  This could be handled by the serializer maintaining a 
>>> WeakHashMap of the sessions that use a particular bundle and blocking in 
>>> the bundle activator's stop method until the list is empty.
>>> 
>>> But if a user was busy for an extended period, like some kind of automated 
>>> scraper or monitor that ended up having the session open for days, the 
>>> check would have to be more granular than the session.  Which seems like 
>>> it's going to be different between 1.4 and 1.5 because of the migration 
>>> from pagemaps.
>>> 
>>> On Jun 23, 2011, at 4:41 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
>>> 
>>>> something else to consider - where this gets even hairier :)
>>>> 
>>>> user accesses a page that has a component from bundle A, the page is 
>>>> serialized.
>>>> admin upgrades bundle A which has a new version of the component -
>>>> that is not compatible serialization-wise
>>>> user click back and the page needs to be serialized - error
>>>> 
>>>> what is needed here i some way to veto a bundle/version removal until
>>>> all web sessions that access components in those bundles have timed
>>>> out. this is not really wicket-specific, more web specific as web apps
>>>> can stick objects into http session...
>>>> 
>>>> -igor
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Brian Topping <topp...@codehaus.org> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Jun 23, 2011, at 10:11 AM, Harald Wellmann wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> what is really needed here is someone taking the time to build a
>>>>>>> generic serialization mechanism for osgi. wicket's serialization is
>>>>>>> pluggable so it can be hooked into that.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'll take a look at the patches, play around with the code and find out 
>>>>>> if I'm one the wrong track or not... If I end up with anything 
>>>>>> interesting enough, I'll get back or attach another patch.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm also taking a look at it.
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Reply via email to