>From https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wickets-xhtml-tags.html, are these still the desired tags for the start of a wicket html file?
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xmlns:wicket="http://wicket.apache.org/dtds.data/wicket-xhtml1.4-strict.dtd"; xml:lang="en" lang="en"> and <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xmlns:wicket="http://wicket.apache.org/dtds.data/wicket-xhtml1.3-strict.dtd"; xml:lang="en" lang="en"> Of these two options, which is preferred? Why would I choose the xml start (versus DOCTYPE)? Does either choice impact the use of HTML 5? Thanks, -Doug -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-1-5-xml-doctype-html-header-xhtml-vs-html5-tp3698608p3698608.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
