I'm seeing requests logged when the RequestLogger is enabled during page 
reloads and when the back button is used. The same code under 1.4 does not. I 
assumed the extra request was to fetch the latest render of the page if it was 
updated via ajax. 

On Friday, December 9, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Dan Retzlaff wrote:

> I wouldn't say there are extra requests, just extra page versions due to
> re-population of the list view. Seems like the re-population process should
> be engineered in a way that doesn't advance the page number. But I'll leave
> that to the experts. :)
> 
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Mark Lichtenberg <
> [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])> wrote:
> 
> > That's exactly what I'm experiencing. In 1.5 it appears there's a few
> > extra requests during a reload that I assume are retrieving the latest page
> > version. I'll create a bug report. Thanks for your help.
> > 
> > Mark
> > 
> > On Friday, December 9, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Dan Retzlaff wrote:
> > > I confirmed this behavior in our application. Simply reloading a page
> > 
> > with
> > > a ListView a few times advances the page ID but not the URL. AJAX links
> > > know to target the new page ID, but any updates they make get lost if the
> > > page gets reloaded from the URL. Sounds like a bug to me. Wicket 1.4
> > > 
> > 
> > didn't
> > > behave this way.
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Dan Retzlaff <[email protected] 
> > > (mailto:[email protected])(mailto:
> > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]))> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Without reusing the ListView items, the "item.add(...)" will get called
> > > > with each render. I expect that'll cause
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > MarkupContainer#addedComponent()
> > > > to WebPage#componentAdded() to WebPage#dirty() which sets a new page
> > > 
> > 
> > ID.
> > > > Sorry I don't have time to test the theory at the moment.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Mark Lichtenberg <
> > > > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])>
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > 1.5.3.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I've narrowed the problem to a ListView being present on the page.
> > > > > Whenever there's a ListView with setReuseItems set to false (the
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > default)
> > > > > the Page ID gets incremented whenever the back button is used to
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > return to
> > > > > the page. I confirmed this with a call to getPage().getPageId() in an
> > > > > onComponentTag method. After returning via the back button the URL
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > is still
> > > > > at the original Page ID while there's a newer version in the page
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > map.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Without a ListView present on the page using the back button does not
> > > > > increment the Page ID and everything works as expected.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I have a quickstart app that illustrates the problem. Here is the
> > page
> > > > > with the applicable code: http://pastebin.com/jn9czHK8
> > > > > 
> > > > > Mark
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Friday, December 9, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Nazaret Kazarian wrote:
> > > > > > Which version of Wicket are you using?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 2011/12/7 Lichtenberg, Mark <[email protected] 
> > > > > > (mailto:[email protected]) (mailto:
> > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])) (mailto:
> > > > > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]))>:
> > > > > > > I have a page containing a number of AjaxLinks that when clicked
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > fetch data
> > > > > > > and update some panels. When a user leaves one of these pages and
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > returns
> > > > > > > via the back button the state of the page isn't always how they
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > left
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > it.
> > > > > > > However, this behavior happens only when the page is returned to
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > the
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > second
> > > > > > > time. Using the the request logger I've been able to partially
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > explain this
> > > > > > > with the page IDs:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 1. First visit to page X has a page ID of 3
> > > > > > > 2. AjaxLink requests for this page also have a page ID of 3.
> > > > > > > 3. User leaves page then returns to page X via the back button;
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > this
> > > > > > > request also has ID of 3
> > > > > > > 4. User clicks AjaxLinks again, but here a new X page is created
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > with an
> > > > > > > ID of 5
> > > > > > > 5. User leaves page and again returns with the back button. Here
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > the
> > > > > > > page state is as they left it in #2, and the URL confirms the
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > page
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > ID of 3
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I understand using the back button will always take the user to
> > ID 3
> > > > > since
> > > > > > > it is present in the URL.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > My workaround so far is to add the Page component to the target
> > of my
> > > > > > > AjaxLink onClick()s. This increments the page ID whenever an
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > AjaxLink
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > clicked and is reflected in the URL, so the back button always
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > returns to
> > > > > > > the last state.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > So I have two questions - Why is a new page X created in step 4
> > > > > above, and
> > > > > > > why does adding the Page component to the ajax request target
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > make a
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > new
> > > > > > > page map entry?
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Mark
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] 
> > > > > > (mailto:[email protected])(mailto:
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > [email protected] 
> > (mailto:[email protected])) (mailto:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > [email protected] 
> > > > > (mailto:[email protected]) (mailto:
> > [email protected] 
> > (mailto:[email protected])))
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] 
> > > > > > (mailto:[email protected])(mailto:
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])) (mailto:
> > > > > 
> > > > > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]))
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to