Instead of adding components to their parents, you provide a child
with their parent at construction time. The idea was that it would
help in parsing, component construction and better feedback when
creating pages. The burden it imposed outweighed the benefits be a
great margin.

Martijn

On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
<jer...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
> Yep.  There was a big change to constructors IIRC, although I can't
> remember exactly what the change was.  Next came 1.3.0 with generics.
>
>
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://wickettraining.com
> *Need a CMS for Wicket?  Use Brix! http://brixcms.org*
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Pierre Goupil <goupilpie...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Good evening,
>>
>> It's an old experiment which was due to go to "ready for prime-time" but
>> never succeeded. If I remember correctly, it was before what became Wicket
>> 1.3.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Pierre
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Lucio Crusca <lu...@sulweb.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello *,
>> >
>> > while reading this page
>> >
>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/working-with-wicket-models.html
>> >
>> > I stumbled upon the following sentence:
>> >
>> > «NOTE: this page is about models like they exist for Wicket 1.x. The
>> IModel
>> > interface is slightly changed in Wicket 2.x»
>> >
>> > What version of Wicket is 2.x? I'm aware of 1.x and 6.x, but never heard
>> > about
>> > 2.x...
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Le bonheur n'est pas une destination, mais une façon de voyager.
>>
>> Papa d'une petite Lou-Ann depuis le 30 juin.
>>



-- 
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Reply via email to