To clarify a bit more, you should end up writing something like:
<form wicket:id="form">
<input type="text" wicket:id="formcomponentA" />
<textarea wicket:id="formcomponentB">...</textarea>
</form>
and Java code
Form form = new Form("form");
form.add(new FormComponentA("formcomponentA"));
form.add(new FormComponentB("formcomponentB"));
In data sabato 2 febbraio 2013 22:28:11, Lucio Crusca ha scritto:
Does that mean I'll have A.html like
<form>
<input type="text" ... />
<textarea>...</textarea>
</form>
and then add my FormComponentA and FormComponentB instances directly to
that Form? And that I won't have any FormComponentA.html /
FormComponentB.html?
Probably not, I suspect I haven't understood. I tried doing like stated above,
but the FormComponent constructor wants an id, so now I assume that each
FormComponent subclass instance has to provide a different id. That makes me
wonder again how should I write the html files.
I'm not able to explain why, but the following solutions seems wrong to me:
<form>
<div wicket:id="formcomponentA">
<input type="text" ... />
</div>
<div wicket:id="formcomponentB">
<textarea>...</textarea>
</div>
<form>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
