Thanks for the suggestion. I dropped the button component and went for a straight stateless form. This allows me to still have a single Wicket component.

On 27/04/2013 10:06 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
Hi,

I haven't tried something like this before and I don't know what exactly
breaks but the simplest solution I see at the moment is to use
StatelessForm.


On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Bertrand Guay-Paquet <
ber...@step.polymtl.ca> wrote:

Hello,

I have action links which I want to transform to POST actions since they
can have side-effects on the database. (See http://stackoverflow.com/**
questions/679013/get-vs-post-**best-practices<http://stackoverflow.com/questions/679013/get-vs-post-best-practices>)
My understanding is that this is only possible with either javascript or
forms.

I decided (for now) to use forms since they're more accessible and easier
to do while keeping the page stateless. I was hoping to use markup like so:
<form action="." method="post">
     <button wicket:id="doIt">do it!</button>
</form>

Note that there is only a Button component and no Form. Since the form
contains only the button, I'd really like to omit it from the component
hierarchy to keep things simple. Is this possible? I can't get my Buttons
onSubmit() method called... One part of the problem is that the "action"
attribute gets changed automatically by Wicket to a relative path to the
application context root.

Or is there another better way to achieve POSTing in Wicket?

Regards,
Bertrand

------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.org<users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Reply via email to