Any demos of this with Wicket form components or simple click listeners ?

I'd much rather a repeater have a single listener for grouped events (or
maybe at the column level for tables)

N
On May 2, 2013 6:10 PM, "Dan Retzlaff" <dretzl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Martin-G elaborated a bit on this last year:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/wicket-users/201209.mbox/%3ccamomwmqdf3ytlstb_kbnvn9t1pump_-+npdtmtvyt+ac6ec...@mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> I think the gist is that you can avoid attaching listeners to each child
> with a single listener on the parent with enough smarts to figure out which
> child generated the event.
>
>
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Martin Dietze <d...@fh-wedel.de> wrote:
>
> > Than you for your help!
> >
> > On Thu, May 02, 2013, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> >
> > > > long blocks of Javascript code executed at "domready".
> > > >
> > >
> > > This depends on how many Ajax components/behaviors you have in your
> page
> > > and how many OnDomReadyHeaderItems are contributed.
> > >
> > > If you use JavaScript event delegation with Wicket Ajax Behavior that
> > > broadcasts events then you can decrease this dramatically.
> >
> > That sounds interesting, but - forgive me my ignorance - this is
> > the first time I hear about this kind of thing. Can you hint me
> > at some example?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > M'bert
> >
> > --
> > ----------- / http://herbert.the-little-red-haired-girl.org /
> > -------------
> > =+=
> > Katz' Law: Man and nations will act rationally when all other
> >            possibilities have been exhausted.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to