Any demos of this with Wicket form components or simple click listeners ? I'd much rather a repeater have a single listener for grouped events (or maybe at the column level for tables)
N On May 2, 2013 6:10 PM, "Dan Retzlaff" <dretzl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Martin-G elaborated a bit on this last year: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/wicket-users/201209.mbox/%3ccamomwmqdf3ytlstb_kbnvn9t1pump_-+npdtmtvyt+ac6ec...@mail.gmail.com%3E > > I think the gist is that you can avoid attaching listeners to each child > with a single listener on the parent with enough smarts to figure out which > child generated the event. > > > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Martin Dietze <d...@fh-wedel.de> wrote: > > > Than you for your help! > > > > On Thu, May 02, 2013, Martin Grigorov wrote: > > > > > > long blocks of Javascript code executed at "domready". > > > > > > > > > > This depends on how many Ajax components/behaviors you have in your > page > > > and how many OnDomReadyHeaderItems are contributed. > > > > > > If you use JavaScript event delegation with Wicket Ajax Behavior that > > > broadcasts events then you can decrease this dramatically. > > > > That sounds interesting, but - forgive me my ignorance - this is > > the first time I hear about this kind of thing. Can you hint me > > at some example? > > > > Cheers, > > > > M'bert > > > > -- > > ----------- / http://herbert.the-little-red-haired-girl.org / > > ------------- > > =+= > > Katz' Law: Man and nations will act rationally when all other > > possibilities have been exhausted. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > > >