Hi, I think you should ask this question in Tomcat mailing list. Also check https://code.google.com/p/memcached-session-manager/
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Uwe Schäfer <u...@codesmell.de> wrote: > hi > > quick question about clustering: am i right to believe that putting > session/pagemap data in a memcached-like storage has advantages over the > tomcat session clustering in terms of latency and robust failover behaviour? > i mean, the latter obviously has the data nearby (when assuming sticky > sessions) whereas the first needs to grab it from (and push it to) external > storage every time even though it is far more selective about what it needs. > > i was wondering if tomcat session clustering can effectivly update only > the dirty parts of the session data? > > i'd love any kind of feedback on that topic INCLUDING 'depends'-answers :) > > cu uwe > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.org<users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >
