Hi,
I use the javascript generated by getCallbackFunction just fine. Here's
an actual function used as an onclick callback:
function (event) {
var attrs = {"u":"./103?1-1.IBehaviorListener.0-","i":"veil"};
var params = {'tourAction': "1"};
attrs.ep = params;
Wicket.Ajax.ajax(attrs);
}
The java code that generated it is :
// Collect the extra parameters
CallbackParameter[] parameters = new CallbackParameter[2];
parameters[0] = CallbackParameter.context("event");
parameters[1] = CallbackParameter.resolved("tourAction", "1");
// Generate callback function
CharSequence callbackFunction = getCallbackFunction(parameters);
This definitely does an ajax call. I haven't looked closely at the
Wicket.Ajax.ajax() code, but it works fine.
Bertrand
On 19/07/2013 9:58 AM, Frank van Lankvelt wrote:
hi all,
in the process of upgrading to wicket 6, I have to do some wicket ajax
calls from custom javascript callbacks. The AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior
seems to provide a bunch of tools to help me out. But I cannot make sense
of the javadoc (& implementation) of #getCallbackFunction:
* Generates a javascript function that can take parameters and performs an
AJAX call which
* includes these parameters. The generated code looks like this:
*
* <pre>
* function(param1, param2) {
* var attrs = attrsJson;
* var params = {'param1': param1, 'param2': param2};
* attrs.ep = jQuery.extend(attrs.ep, params);
* Wicket.Ajax.ajax(attrs);
* }
* </pre>
But AFAIK the last line of the generated function Wicket.Ajax.ajax(attrs)
does not do an ajax call.
It just uses jQuery to register event listeners.
So have I missed something, or is this a bug?
thanks, Frank
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
