The question is: why introduce another template engine to generate HTML if you already have a wonderful one in place? You are not making your task depend on wicket you are rolling out a task that uses wicket to generate HTML. This is not going to be different if you use velocity as you suggested before: you just replace wicket by velocity.
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:40 AM, Paul Borș <p...@bors.ws> wrote: > I'm not sure you want to have you scheduled task/alerts depend on Wicket. > They should be stand alone services in In their own processes IMOP. > > Have a great day, > Paul Bors > > > On May 19, 2014, at 7:42 AM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > See > > > https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/core/util/string/ComponentRenderer.java#L46for > > inspiration. > > > > Martin Grigorov > > Wicket Training and Consulting > > > > > >> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Sandor Feher <sfe...@bluesystem.hu> > wrote: > >> > >> Ok. Let's say I get the reference. How can I render the page then ? > >> Where should I put it ? > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Page-rendering-from-quartz-job-tp4665860p4665933.html > >> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >> > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > -- Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
