Maybe you could even just push JSON to client side and generate items
content at client side which is going to be way faster


On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
reier...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Why don't you try routing all the click to a part of you application that
> is always available? E.g.
>
> 1- You have a list of items that are pushed... They are in a certain
> container that is "always" there... At client and server side
> 2- The items are pushed but instead of normal AJAX link you use link to
> the parent never changing container passing ID of item. This way click will
> never fail and it is still sort of object oriented...
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Daniel Stoch <daniel.st...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > You can use Atmopshere to hide/disable the client side too, not just the
>> > server side.
>>
>> Of course, I already do that.
>> But user can click the link after state was changed on the server side
>> but before these changes are pushed to client browser.
>>
>> --
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Martin Grigorov
>> > Wicket Training and Consulting
>> > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Daniel Stoch <daniel.st...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net> wrote:
>> >> >> So page was rendered in a browser,
>> >> >> on the server component tree was changed
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > What triggers the change to the component tree? On which thread? Are
>> you
>> >> > using websockets?
>> >> >
>> >> > Sven
>> >>
>> >> In general this thread is not initialized by user action but by
>> >> application. So yes, it can be push from a server (eg. using
>> >> Atmosphere - this is my case) or by ajax self updating behavior.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> DS
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On 07/04/2014 12:13 PM, Daniel Stoch wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi all,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I think such question occurs from time to time on this list, but I
>> >> >> have never found a good answer how to solve such problem in general.
>> >> >> The problem is similar to my last question:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/How-to-handle-click-on-disabled-links-ListenerInvocationNotAllowedException-td4666287.html
>> >> >> but now there is a situation when link was removed from page (not
>> >> >> disabled).
>> >> >>
>> >> >> So page was rendered in a browser, on the server component tree was
>> >> >> changed, but user clicks a link in a browser before this changes
>> will
>> >> >> be pushed to it. It leads to an exception:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: Component 'xxx' has been
>> >> >> removed from page.
>> >> >> at
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.wicket.core.request.handler.ListenerInterfaceRequestHandler.respond(ListenerInterfaceRequestHandler.java:178)
>> >> >> at
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycle$HandlerExecutor.respond(RequestCycle.java:862)
>> >> >> at
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.wicket.request.RequestHandlerStack.execute(RequestHandlerStack.java:64)
>> >> >> at
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycle.execute(RequestCycle.java:261)
>> >> >> at
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycle.processRequest(RequestCycle.java:218)
>> >> >> at
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.wicket.request.cycle.RequestCycle.processRequestAndDetach(RequestCycle.java:289)
>> >> >> at
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.processRequestCycle(WicketFilter.java:259)
>> >> >> at
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.processRequest(WicketFilter.java:201)
>> >> >> at
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketServlet.doGet(WicketServlet.java:137)
>> >> >> at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:735)
>> >> >> at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:848)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> How it should be properly handled in application? Unfortunately this
>> >> >> is not a dedicated exception to catch somewhere, but a common
>> >> >> WicketRuntimeException.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Best regards,
>> >> >> Daniel
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
>



-- 
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro

Reply via email to