Hi, On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Adam Hammer <adamhamm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I also found it confusing, I use wicket-native-websocket-jetty9 with wicket > 6.18 and jetty 9.0.+ I'll update the guide. > > I was not able to get running on jetty 9.2 yet. > Jetty 9.2+ is JSR356 complaint so you should use wicket-native-websocket-javax. Same for Tomcat 8+. But websocket-api.jar, jetty-**.jar (9.2) and tomcat 8 are built with Java 7. This is the reason why wicket-native-websocket-javax is available only for Wicket 7. If you use JDK 1.7+ for your applications then you can use wicket-core 6.x together with wicket-native-websocket-javax 7.0.0-M4. Make sure you add Maven <exclusions> for wicket-core/util/request:7.0.0-M4 > > Adam > On Nov 10, 2014 5:04 PM, "Niranjan Rao" <nhr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > Document at https://wicket.apache.org/guide/guide/nativewebsockets.html > > shows maven example. I am assuming that the version in the example is > > wicket version. > > > > However maven repository search does not show jar files for version > 6.18.0 > > or any versions in 6.* series. Wicket-native-websocket does show all the > > versions at http://search.maven.org/#search|gav|1|g%3A%22org. > > apache.wicket%22%20AND%20a%3A%22wicket-native-websocket%22 > > < > http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cgav%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org.apache.wicket%22%20AND%20a%3A%22wicket-native-websocket%22 > > > > > > Is this documentation problem? Should I be using wicket-native-websocket > > and not wicket-native-websocket-javax for jsr 356. > > > > Regards, > > > > Niranjan > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > > > >
