Thanks so much for the info and the pointers!

Andrew

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
[email protected]> wrote:

> e.g.
>
>
> https://github.com/reiern70/wicket-bootstrap/blob/master/bootstrap-core/src/main/java/de/agilecoders/wicket/core/markup/html/bootstrap/tabs/ClientSideBootstrapTabbedPanel.java
>
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think you will need to write custom tabbed panel that hides the tabs
> with
> > JS on the client side.
> >
> > The problem with Wicket's default TabbedPanel is that it sees only one
> tab
> > at a time - the active tab.
> > I.e. the component tree is something like
> > "...form:tabbedPanel:content:nestedFormX:..."
> > Switching the tabs replaces the content component and thus nestedFormX
> > becomes nestedFormY.
> >
> > Martin Grigorov
> > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Andrew Geery <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I have a top-level form.
> > >
> > > The top-level form contains two nested forms.
> > >
> > > The nested forms are inside of a TabbedPanel so only one is visible at
> a
> > > time.
> > >
> > > The save button for the top-level form is always visible.  The save
> > button
> > > submits the top-level form and submitting the top-level form also has
> the
> > > effect of submitting the nested forms.
> > >
> > > This all is correct and works as it should.
> > >
> > > The issue is that Wicket (correctly) only validates the form that is on
> > the
> > > tab that is visible.  The form that is on the tab that is not visible
> is
> > > not actually being submitted so it doesn't get validated.
> > >
> > > In the past, I've prevented the user from switching tabs if one of the
> > tabs
> > > contained a validation error, but I can't do that in this case.
> > >
> > > When the top-level form is submitted, is there a way I can mark both
> > forms
> > > as visible and have Wicket validate both forms?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Andrew
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
>

Reply via email to