Hi, we were looking at the performance aspect, yes - but if big CSS files are included it is as you already mentioned not that fast, because all is processed via regex.
Maybe one option to improve it would be to be able to exclude files or provide a pattern which files should be processed. WDYT? kind regards Tobias > Am 14.12.2015 um 14:00 schrieb Rakesh A <[email protected]>: > > Hi, > > I was experimenting with 'CssUrlReplacer', and I see that the performance of > CSS file loading might get affected if we enable it. I know that it depends > on the content of (no of image URLs) CSS files (and documentation doesn't > mention it also :) ) > > In my tests, I was trying to load ExtJs theme CSS file, and it took > "18668ms" to process it, and this file has 633 instances of background image > css property with 'url'. > > One can extend this class and exclude it from the processing list, but would > like to know if the performance aspects of this class were investigated? > Any plans to improve this implementation ? > > Regards, > Rakesh.A > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/CssUrlReplacer-and-performance-with-certain-CSS-files-tp4672969.html > Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
