Martin.

Thanks for explanation. This little thing was preventing me from jumping to
wicket 7. Now I can migrate my project :-)

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Problem was
> >
> >
> attributes.setEventPropagation(AjaxRequestAttributes.EventPropagation.STOP
> > );
> >
> > was need. Before STOP was the default, now it is BUBBLE. Just wondering
> > why default was changed?
> >
> It changed because BUBBLE is the default in the browser DOM.
>
>
> >
> > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> This seem to be some bug on the bootstrap layer NOT a Wicket bug:
> >> stripping bootstrap specifics makes wicket AJAX work.
> >>
> >> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> >> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> @Martin,
> >>>
> >>> cleaned up working branch.
> >>>
> >>> https://github.com/l0rdn1kk0n/wicket-bootstrap/pull/604
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> >>> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> Sorry for the long time it took... Today I finally managed to find
> some
> >>>> free time to create something you can use to see the problem in
> action:
> >>>>
> >>>> https://github.com/l0rdn1kk0n/wicket-bootstrap/pull/603
> >>>>
> >>>> Shows a component (Bootstrap radio choice) that does not work in
> wicket
> >>>> 7.3.0
> >>>>
> >>>> and PR
> >>>>
> >>>> https://github.com/l0rdn1kk0n/wicket-bootstrap/pull/602
> >>>>
> >>>> shows the same component working on 6.3.
> >>>>
> >>>> [image: Inline image 1]
> >>>>
> >>>> @Martin,
> >>>>
> >>>> I will later on create a new (cleaner) PR to replace 603 to add only
> >>>> radio choice renderer for 6.x.
> >>>>
> >>>> Disclaimer: I do not know if this is an error introduced by the
> >>>> bootstrap layer or if this can be reproduced with  a bare bones wicket
> >>>> example.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> >>>> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Let me see is I find the time to created it (it uses my own bootstrap
> >>>>> components)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Sven Meier <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> with a quickstart it would be easy to spot the problem.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>> Sven
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 18.11.2015 13:46, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If I "revert" to 6.21.0 problem disappears so this seems to be a
> >>>>>>> 7.1.0
> >>>>>>> "issue".
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Well it is the same in the sense that no client side AJAX event
> >>>>>>>> seems to
> >>>>>>>> be triggered.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi Sven,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for the feedback. It should not be the case
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>   radioGroup = new RadioGroup<T>("radioGroup", getModel());
> >>>>>>>>>          tuneRadioGroup(radioGroup);
> >>>>>>>>>          radioGroup.setRenderBodyOnly(false);
> >>>>>>>>>          radioGroup.setOutputMarkupId(true);
> >>>>>>>>>          add(radioGroup);
> >>>>>>>>>          if(changeHandler != null) {
> >>>>>>>>>              radioGroup.add(new
> >>>>>>>>> AjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior() {
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>                  @Override
> >>>>>>>>>                  protected void onUpdate(AjaxRequestTarget
> target)
> >>>>>>>>> {
> >>>>>>>>>                      changeHandler.onSelectionChanged(target,
> >>>>>>>>> radioGroup.getModel().getObject());
> >>>>>>>>>                  }
> >>>>>>>>>              });
> >>>>>>>>>          }
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Sven Meier <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> nothing specific I can think of ... perhaps WICKET-5476?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>>>>> Sven
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 17.11.2015 18:55, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I have a bootstrap based component that uses a RadioGroup
> >>>>>>>>>>> + AjaxFormChoiceComponentUpdatingBehavior. This was working
> >>>>>>>>>>> perfectly
> >>>>>>>>>>> fine
> >>>>>>>>>>> on wicket 6. Now is no loger working with wicket 7. Are there
> any
> >>>>>>>>>>> (obvious)
> >>>>>>>>>>> changes on the way RadioGroup works that might be preventing it
> >>>>>>>>>>> from
> >>>>>>>>>>> working?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> >
>



-- 
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro

Reply via email to