It was too good to be true :-)
TechEmpower said that they've had some mistake in the way they executed the
tests and this led to these good numbers.
After fixing the errors the difference between round 13 and 14 are:
Framework Test Type Old RPS New RPS Change in RPS
Old Rank New Rank Change in Rank
wicket json 328,388 339,015
+3.2% 39 41 -2
wicket plaintext 335,404 344,897
+2.8% 62 65 -3
wicket db 38,498 44,699
+16.1% 92 83 +9
wicket query 36,635 43,500
+18.7% 78 65 +13
wicket update 18,724 24,017
+28.3% 50 35 +15
wicket fortune 24,363 23,641
-3.0% 76 94 -18
https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/r13-vs-r14p1.1.html
Everything looks normal!
Happy Friday! :-)
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>
wrote:
> There won't be a difference.
> There is only one page in these tests and it is stateless, i.e. it is not
> stored.
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Martin Makundi <martin.makundi@
> koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
>
>> Would be interesting to run this performance test Wicket with speed patch
>> #6177
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6177
>>
>> 2017-03-23 15:58 GMT+02:00 Marcel Barbosa Pinto <marcel.po...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> > That is really good!
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:47 AM, Andrea Del Bene <an.delb...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Great!
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:28 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>> > > tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > "New" does not mean better. :-)
>> > > >
>> > > > kind regards
>> > > >
>> > > > Tobias
>> > > >
>> > > > > Am 22.03.2017 um 23:09 schrieb Martijn Dashorst <
>> > > > martijn.dasho...@gmail.com>:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > WOW
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>> > > mgrigo...@apache.org>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > >> Hi,
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Somehow Wicket finished at 3rd position at the last preview run
>> of
>> > > > >> TechEmpower framework tests :-)
>> > > > >> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/#
>> > > > section=data-r14&hw=ph&test=json
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> At plaintext test we are at #18:
>> > > > >> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/#
>> > > > section=data-r14&hw=ph&test=plaintext
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Too bad that the new MySQL JDBC driver v.6 failed at their
>> servers,
>> > > > >> otherwise I'd expect good results there too.
>> > > > >> https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/pull/2603
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Wicket 7.6.0 performs ~300% better than Round 13!
>> > > > >> https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/previews/round14/
>> > > > r13-vs-r14p1.html
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> The improvements come from
>> > > > >> https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/commit/
>> > > > 54152ceb735cf63351537556aa316dfd29202af4
>> > > > >> - custom root request mapper
>> > > > >> - reduced the response size to the minimum
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Once again the reactive frameworks are slower than the good old
>> > > Wicket!
>> > > > :-)
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Martin Grigorov
>> > > > >> Wicket Training and Consulting
>> > > > >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best:
>> > http://wicketinaction.com
>> > > > >
>> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
>> > ---------
>> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------
>> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > Marcel Barbosa Pinto
>> > 55 11 98255 8288
>> >
>>
>
>
