normally I would agree.. But when our designer gives us the html, and there
are tables in it we need to change that stuff.. I do not like the idea that
the web framework forces you to change markup so that it can work.. One
thing are to teach the devs that there are some quirks with the web
framework (thats completely expected). But to have to teach the designer
about a web framework so they can avoid the quirky parts seems wrong.
Its not part of Wickets statement anyhow.
> Just Java & HTML
>
> Leverage what you know about Java or your favourite HTML editor to write
> Wicket applications. With pure Java code and HTML markup Wicket is the
> go-to web framework for purists.
>
/rant off :)
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 8:24 AM Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> if something "look like a duck, walk like a duck and sound like a duck" -
> it is duck :)
> CSS table are tables, but with no HTML '<table>' tags :)
>
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 13:22, nino martinez wael <
> nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > if its CSS its not a table right?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 7:25 AM Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Actually you can :)
> > > But you need CSS tables for this :)
> > >
> > > On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 11:53, nino martinez wael <
> > > nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I agree with Maxim, but I do not know the side effects, im going to
> try
> > > > it.. As it is now (out of the box), we cannot have nested forms in
> > tables
> > > > (for example on form per <tr>) without breaking html.
> > > >
> > > > -Nino
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 3:24 AM Maxim Solodovnik <
> solomax...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I would say we can create overridable method so users can specify
> > which
> > > > tag
> > > > > to use
> > > > > it will help with `<tr>`
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 01:39, Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think we could improve nested Forms so that only <form> tags
> are
> > > > > > turned into a <div>, but anything else stays as it is.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > WDYT?
> > > > > > Sven
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Am 23.04.19 um 10:01 schrieb nino martinez wael:
> > > > > > > Hi
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > When nesting forms, the form tag are changed to an div and it
> is
> > > hard
> > > > > > coded:
> > > > > > > org/apache/wicket/markup/html/form/Form.java:1597
> > > > > > > ...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > tag.setName("div");
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If only I could change the tag to be tr, it would produce valid
> > > html.
> > > > > Are
> > > > > > > it deliberate to be hardcoded?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > WBR
> > > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards / Med venlig hilsen
> > > > Nino Martinez
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > WBR
> > > Maxim aka solomax
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards / Med venlig hilsen
> > Nino Martinez
> >
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
--
Best regards / Med venlig hilsen
Nino Martinez
