I mean, don't get me wrong. I'm in favour of session stickiness and I can't understand why this is not preferred.
But anyway. If we have aTCP load-balancer that switches on a timely basis every 200ms then session replication doesn't really work, or? -- Sent from: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Users-forum-f1842947.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
