Hi Colm,

thanks for your answer. That means, I

- fetch the Signature-Action,

- extract the URI-Attribute of the Reference-element,

- retrieve the SecurityTokenReference with the ID eq. the URI-attribute,

- retrieve the URI of this and compare it with the ID of the assertion - element

if that fits well, how can I check whether the assertion was signed
with this signature?


Cheers from Dublin,


Lennart

---------------

Hi,

WSS4J considers a SAML token to be signed (with respect to the "actions")
only if there is an internal signature. In your case, you will have to
retrieve a Signature action instead + check to see that the SAML Assertion
was signed by it (indirectly).

Colm.

On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Lennart Reuther <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Apache WS-Team,
>
> first thanks for the WSS4J - library, as it really makes my life
> handling SAML-Authentication much easier.
>
> I am currently working with WSS4J-1.6.16. I have the issue, that an
> assertion-element is not recognized as signed by
> WSSecurityUtil.fetchActions, when the signing takes places via an direct
> reference.
>
> Please find attached a xml-file of the request.
>
> Debugged down, there issues goes down to the call of
> "AssertionImpl.isSigned", within xmltooling.1.3.2-1. There all elements
> children are checked for being the signature, but the direct reference
> gets ignored.
>
> Do I have to retrieve the directly referenced signature manually within
> my CallbackHandler (using DOMCallbackLookup) or is this something WSS4J
> is supposed to do on it's own?
>
> Thanks for your help,
>
> Lennart
>



-- 
Colm O hEigeartaigh

Talend Community Coderhttp://coders.talend.com

Reply via email to