Le 18 janv. 08 à 00:27, Sergiu Dumitriu a écrit :

Jerome Velociter wrote:
AFAIK, xwiki .js files aren't parsed by the velocity renderer. You might find JS mixed with velocity only in templates inside <script> tags.

That's how much I could see with less and grep in albatross and would be already very relevant.

Not exactly, some of the JS files are parsed (those that get through the SkinAction).

These are the ones I would like to know about.

But I don't think that is an issue, they can be cached.

It is an issue.
In mod_jk, it is classical to configure the "static" resources to be fully ignored by the servlet container... no caching, just normal apache httpd download work (with file modifs headers, only-if-changed- since responses etc).

Caching is an alternative for performance management, and it relies on the proper usage of Vary headers... report on experience there is interesting as well.

AFAIR, there is no (outer) script that really depends on the current request.

Then for performance that script should be kind of isolated.
In an ideal solution, all that would be under xwiki/static and it'd be easy to take part into httpd (which may well be on another host). Right now, I think that xwiki/skins would already be a good first step.

If Have an answer to question 1 (or a way to track the answer on individual files, I think I could let experiments be made...

paul

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to