Ivan Levashew wrote: > I have seen another threads, but I didn't noticed any good idea. I have > only seen JCR project in the sandbox. > > http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/JcrStore > > I have no idea what is JCR. «JCR» sounds very different from > «filesystem». Installing and maintaining JCR is likely to be yet another > brainache I'd like to skip. Finally, «Translate XWQL to JCRSQL2» sounds > very different from «simple and reliable». JCR seems to be proposed as a replacement for the database entirely. I would have to see it's performance before I would want to advocate for the idea.
> «Storing 10Mb octet streams > in database» doesn't sound like being reliable, and indeed it caused > strange problems recently. On the one hand it definitely over-stresses the database but on the other hand it is very nice to be able to do a database dump, wipe the disk, load the dump and be right back where you were before. Maybe a hybrid where content is stored in the db and 'cached' on the hard disk but caches make debugging a huge pain. Still something has to be done about the max_packet issue. > > So my humble wish is to see xwikiattachment_content table replaced with > a mere filesystem storage. Other tables left intact. Maintaing > «Space/Document/Attachment» structure is not a requirement (althoung it > would be nice since I could share it in GreyLink DC++ this way). > _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
