Ludovic,
I knew it's used there so I tried to answer the question about the
international-character-set of the file-names.
I think the answer is no because I uploaded:
http://planete.sankore.org/xwiki/bin/view/Coll_polx/lecielbleuteX
with the tile "le ciel bleuté ¬X>λω" and with the filename: "le ciel bleuté
¬X>λω.png"
However, my resource got named lecielbleuteX and the filename as well.
After that I tried with viewer=attachments and again all characters got
"wersternalized"...
It would be interesting to know if this was intended.
paul
Le 24 janv. 2012 à 23:32, Ludovic Dubost a écrit :
> It's stable from my POV. It's being used in production on
> http://planete.sankore.org
>
> Ludovic
>
> 2012/1/24 Vincent Massol <[email protected]>
>
>>
>> On Jan 24, 2012, at 10:37 PM, Ryszard Łach wrote:
>>
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> Could anyone, please, give any info about status of filesystem
>>> attachment storage?
>>>
>>> Is it stable?
>>
>> Caleb can probably answer better here since he's the one who implemented
>> this.
>>
>> My POV:
>> * It's supposed to be usable
>> * We need more real life reports that it's working fine in production
>> * We've received some bug reports already. Several have been fixed, there
>> might still be some open issues. You could search open issues about
>> "filesystem" on http://jira.xwiki.org to know specific details
>> * One current limitation I know is that clustering is not easily done
>> since you need to cluster the filesystem. This can be achieved with a NFS
>> mount for example.
>>
>>> Does it deal with non-ascii filenames prolerply?
>>
>> No idea. Caleb?
>>
>>> If so - why in 3.4 versions default storage for attachments will be
>>> hibernate?
>>
>> Filesystem storage is not a perfect solution:
>> * clustering issue mentioned above
>> * it makes it harder to backup your XWiki system since you need to backup
>> not only the DB but also the directory where the attachments are saved.
>> It's nice to know that everything is in the DB.
>> * the filesystem is one additional point of failure
>>
>> Ideally we would not need filesystem storage at all since DBs should be
>> able to stream arbitrary data in a performant manner. In practice only some
>> DBs support this (MySQL doesn't AFAIK).
>>
>> All that said I completely agree with your question. I'd also like that we
>> answer it better and that we post this status on xwiki.org.
>>
>> So guys, can you complement/correct what I've said above so that we can
>> get a correct statement about this feature? :)
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ludovic Dubost
> Founder and CEO
> Blog: http://blog.ludovic.org/
> XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com
> Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
