I was reading XWiki syntax help in my wiki.

Since XWiki syntax 2.1 seemed to be a minor upgrade of 2.0, I assumed I had
to follow XWiki Syntax 2.0.

Because the syntax help page was very long, I didn't bother to read the
whole content but just skimmed the page, so I missed XWiki 2.1 Link
Specification.

I think XWiki 2.1 link syntax should be included in the "Links" table, too.


On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On Nov 22, 2012, at 1:38 AM, crocket <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks guys.
> >
> > Why is the 2.1 syntax explained in a place where I can't find easily?
>
> That's not really helping us… Instead, tell us where it should be
> according to you. That would help!
>
> You should also explain how you searched for it. And explain if you were
> looking:
> * in XE itself
> * on xwiki.org
> * on google (For example http://lmgtfy.com/?q=xwiki+syntax+2.1 , can't be
> simpler)
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
> > Maybe I am a fool, but there are lots of fools in the world.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:32 AM, crocket <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> [[label>>Space.Page#anchor]] doesn't seem to refer to the anchor but to
> a
> >> non-existent page
> >>
> >> I use XWiki 4.3 milestone 1.
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to