Hello Dan, I believe the Batik library is used for printing to PDF only, but I could well be wrong.
You can use an SVG image that you upload as you would upload a png image. This will simply embed it within the html page and let the browser render it. This works since recent versions of XWiki (maybe 6?). I doubt this uses Batik. Isn't that sufficient? At least, to my eyes, this is a very important use case for all the technical documentation we write. Paul > dullfig <mailto:da...@grmcompany.com> > 21 April 2016 at 17:54 > It is my understanding that XWiki includes the Apache Batik library to > handle > SVG content, so my question is why does XWiki not handle SVG content > natively (without the SVG Macro), and why does the browser have to support > SVG? With Batik, shouldn't XWiki be able to render the SVG without the > help > of the browers? > > Dan > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/XWiki-SVG-and-Apache-Batik-tp7599123.html > Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users@xwiki.org > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
