Hello,

Thanks for reporting it. I will make a PR for solving it.

Regards,
JL

On Saturday, 11 June 2016, Timur Shenkao <t...@timshenkao.su> wrote:

> Hi guys!
>
> I agree with Boris that this feature (ability to issue multiple Hive
> queries simultaneously) is extremely important as people use Hive
> interpereter not only against Hive but against other systems, too.
> Predominantly RDBMS.
> Making changes in source code by ourselves (not to mention without tests)
> leads to incomatibility with future releases and doesnt' solve problem.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Prasad Wagle <prasadwa...@gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','prasadwa...@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>> Hi Boris,
>>
>> You can run concurrent queries by overriding the getScheduler function in
>> JDBCInterpreter to return ParallelScheduler like HiveInterpreter.
>>
>> @jongyoul - should we change JDBCInterpreter. getScheduler to return
>> ParallelScheduler? It would also be nice to make maxConcurrency
>> configurable.
>>
>> JDBCInterpreter:
>>   @Override
>>   public Scheduler getScheduler() {
>>     return SchedulerFactory.singleton().createOrGetFIFOScheduler(
>>         JDBCInterpreter.class.getName() + this.hashCode());
>>   }
>>
>> HiveInterpreter:
>>   @Override
>>   public Scheduler getScheduler() {
>>     return SchedulerFactory.singleton().createOrGetParallelScheduler(
>>         HiveInterpreter.class.getName() + this.hashCode(), 10);
>>   }
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Prasad
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 5:52 AM, Boris Schminke <schmink...@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','schmink...@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>> when I used the Hive interpreter I could send several queries in
>>> parallel. Now in Zeppelin 0.6 Hive Interpreter is merged into JDBC (which
>>> is very good) but I can not execute concurrent Hive queries (which is not
>>> so good).
>>> How can I run concurrent queries to Hive using JDBC interpreter now in
>>> Zeppelin 0.6?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Boris
>>>
>>
>>
>

-- 
이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈
http://madeng.net

Reply via email to