Perfect...with jdbc do you need to package several drivers? Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 17, 2016, at 1:32 PM, mina lee <mina...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi all! > > Zeppelin just started release process. Prior to creating release candidate I > want to ask users' opinion about how you want it to be packaged. > > For the last release(0.5.6), we have released one binary package which > includes all interpreters. > The concern with providing one type of binary package is that package size > will be quite big(~600MB). > So I am planning to provide two binary packages: > - zeppelin-0.6.0-bin-all.tgz (includes all interpreters) > - zeppelin-0.6.0-bin-min.tgz (includes only most used interpreters) > > I am thinking about putting spark(pyspark, sparkr, sql), python, jdbc, shell, > markdown, angular in minimized package. > Could you give your opinion on whether these sets are enough, or some of them > are ok to be excluded? > > Community's opinion will be helpful to make decision not only for 0.6.0 but > also for 0.7.0 release since we are planning to provide only minimized > package from 0.7.0 release. From the 0.7.0 version, interpreters those are > not included in binary package will be able to use dynamic interpreter > feature [1] which is in progress under [2]. > > Thanks, > Mina > > [1] > http://zeppelin.apache.org/docs/0.6.0-SNAPSHOT/manual/dynamicinterpreterload.html > [2] https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/908
