What about giving *freedom* to users, and then, exposing again such an
embedded mode to users ?

Well, not all users have the same needs, or want to run Zeppelin the same
way. On my side, being able to use such a 'embedded' mode will be useful.

Thanks.

Le mer. 16 nov. 2016 à 23:45, moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org> a écrit :

> Hi,
>
> Zeppelin actually does have embedded mode that runs Interpreter in the
> same JVM that Zeppelin run. This feature does not exposed to user, but it
> can be controlled by  InterpreterOption.remote field.
>
> https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/blob/master/zeppelin-interpreter/src/main/java/org/apache/zeppelin/interpreter/InterpreterOption.java#L30
>
> It was the only available mode in the beginning. Once Zeppelin has got
> remote interpreter with separate JVM, this mode became invisible from user
> and only used for unittest.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Thanks,
> moon
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 6:09 AM kevin giroux <giroux.kevin...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like some information about the binding of each interpreter. I
> read the documentation,
> http://zeppelin.apache.org/docs/latest/manual/interpreters.html#interpreter-binding-mode
> <https://webmail.one.grp/owa/redir.aspx?SURL=ciA3Yte_cWFh3_hvboFd8T4RBahq4L80puhP8B8xNtLkkz1clgzUCGgAdAB0AHAAOgAvAC8AegBlAHAAcABlAGwAaQBuAC4AYQBwAGEAYwBoAGUALgBvAHIAZwAvAGQAbwBjAHMALwBsAGEAdABlAHMAdAAvAG0AYQBuAHUAYQBsAC8AaQBuAHQAZQByAHAAcgBlAHQAZQByAHMALgBoAHQAbQBsACMAaQBuAHQAZQByAHAAcgBlAHQAZQByAC0AYgBpAG4AZABpAG4AZwAtAG0AbwBkAGUA&URL=http%3a%2f%2fzeppelin.apache.org%2fdocs%2flatest%2fmanual%2finterpreters.html%23interpreter-binding-mode>,
> but i would like to know if there is a "embedded mode" in progress.
> This mode will work :
>  -> This mode will allow to run the interpreter in the same JVM that
> Zeppelin run.
> For the moment, each interpreter (that need a JVM), run on a different JVM.
> -> If will be powerfull, if we can reduce the number of JVM for example
> Zeppelin and 1 Interpreter. (that allow users to run Zeppelin on very smart
> device that doesn't have a lot of memory)
>
> What do you think about this ?
>
> Sincerely in advance for the future reply,
> Kevin Giroux
>
>
> --
> Kévin Giroux
>
> --
Kévin Giroux

Reply via email to