Thanks for replying it. I'll make a PR for doing it. On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Prabhjyot Singh <prabhjyotsi...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1. > > Yes, agreed I too think its overhead, and all the features can be achieved > via JDBCInterpreter. > > On 23 January 2017 at 10:45, Jongyoul Lee <jongy...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> We, currently, have two kind of Interpreter supporting to connect DB >> which are PostgresqlInterpreter and JDBCInterpreter. In history, >> JDBCInterpreter is based on PostgresqlInterpeter and has the same function >> with it. I suggest to remove PostgrsqlInterpreter in Zeppelin's code base >> because they have same functions and JDBCInterpreter is now de facto >> standard. All new contribution based on JDBC function is provided and added >> onto JDBCInterpreter. In old times, I suggested same thing but it wouldn't >> be accepted because PostgresqlInterpreter was better then JDBCInterpreter >> at that time. But, now, JDBCInterpreter include all functions of >> PostgresqlInterpreter and provide better functions. >> >> How do you guys think of it? If it's accepted, 0.8.0 won't have >> PostgresqlInterpreter anymore. >> >> Regards, >> Jongyoul Lee >> >> -- >> 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈 >> http://madeng.net >> > > > > -- > > Warm Regards, > > Prabhjyot Singh > -- 이종열, Jongyoul Lee, 李宗烈 http://madeng.net
