+1.

Would you mind getting ZEPPELIN-4299 merged to branch-0.8?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-4299

PR already open
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/3423

The issue is pretty annoying for the end user experience.

Best regards
Andreas

On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 8:18 PM Miquel Angel Andreu Febrer <
miquelangeland...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> El mar., 24 sept. 2019 18:28, moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org> escribió:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 8:16 PM Prabhjyot Singh <
> prabhjyotsi...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > I see a lot of issues are fixed in the past few months. This sounds a
> > > good intermediate step before 0.9 release.
> > >
> > > On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 00:23, Eric Pugh <
> ep...@opensourceconnections.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> The iPython related fixes would address some issues I’ve run into!
> > >>
> > >> On Sep 22, 2019, at 11:31 PM, Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi Folks,
> > >>
> > >> 0.8.1 is released half year ago (Jan 2019), I'd to start the
> discussion
> > >> about releasing of 0.8.2 which fixed several critical issues. Let me
> > know
> > >> your thoughts, thanks.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://jira.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20ZEPPELIN%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.8.2
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Best Regards
> > >>
> > >> Jeff Zhang
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________
> > >> *Eric Pugh **| *Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC |
> > 434.466.1467
> > >> | http://www.opensourceconnections.com | My Free/Busy
> > >> <http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>
> > >> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed
> > >> <
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw
> > >
> > >> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to
> be
> > >> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless
> > >> of whether attachments are marked as such.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Prabhjyot Singh
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to