0.9 will load note lazily, only load it when this note is opened. lewinma(lewinma) <lewi...@tencent.com> 于2020年2月18日周二 下午4:54写道：
> Does 0.9 has some change? > > > > *From: *Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com> > *Reply-To: *"users@zeppelin.apache.org" <users@zeppelin.apache.org> > *Date: *Tuesday, February 18, 2020 at 16:53 > *To: *users <users@zeppelin.apache.org> > *Subject: *Re: Zeppelin performances with a lot of notebooks(Internet > mail) > > > > Then I guess it is due to backend issue. Could you check the memory usage > of the JVM process ? In 0.8, all the notes will be loaded in to memory, > which might be the reason of slow performance. > > > > <stephane.d...@orange.com> 于2020年2月18日周二 下午4:38写道： > > Yes, it is slow in another tab, its slow even if I close and re-open by > browser. > > > > > > *From:* Jeff Zhang [mailto:zjf...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 18, 2020 09:36 > *To:* users > *Subject:* Re: Zeppelin performances with a lot of notebooks > > > > It's hard to say. Have you tried to open another tab ? If it is still > slow, then it might be issue in backend. > > > > <stephane.d...@orange.com> 于2020年2月18日周二 下午4:32写道： > > Hello, > > > > I’m facing performances issues with zeppelin. It seems that these > performances are mainly located on the browser side. I have actually a > Zeppelin instance with quite a lot of notebooks and many paragraphs inside, > and I find that Zeppelin refresh and rendering is really slow. It means for > example that the spark job is finished, but the Web UI shows that it is 20% > completed, and it takes a few minutes to reflect the real spark status. > > So, I extracted one notebook, and imported it in another Zeppelin on the > same server. Actually, I have this: > > - A Zeppelin 0.8.0 which comes with Hortonworks data platform > > - A standalone Zeppelin 0.8.2 on the same server, with the same > configuration for memory > > > > And then, my notebook imported in the standalone instance runs really > fastly. One difference I also have between the 2 instances is that the > standalone one has its notebook on local filesystem, while the HDP one has > its notebook on hdfs. For sure, hdfs access is slower than the local fs > one. Can this also be a possible origin of this issue? > > > > Thanks for your help, > > > > Stéphane > > > > > -- > > Best Regards > > Jeff Zhang > > > > > -- > > Best Regards > > Jeff Zhang > -- Best Regards Jeff Zhang
