On Tue, 2 Jan 2001 12:44:07 -0500, Nat Hager III wrote:
>That is a funny article. They could have added resistance to mandatory
>seat-belt laws 15 years ago, protecting the sacred right to have your body
>hurled through a windshield at 100 km/h.
If you don't wear a seatbelt, you don't have anything that should be
protected, so such laws are just an excuse for the police to stop
whomever they want.
--
Brad Ackerman N1MNB "It is in fact our contention that...the U.S.-Canada
[EMAIL PROTECTED] border is likely to disappear before any politician
PGP: 0x62D6B223 finds the political courage to negotiate its removal."
http://skaro.pair.com/ -- Papademetriou and Meyers, ceip.org, June 2000
